Most trust department compliance reviews focus on what is visible: the investment portfolio, the accounting records, the regulatory filings. These are well-understood, consistently monitored, and generally well-controlled.
Real estate assets tend to occupy a different category. They carry administrative complexity that falls outside standard compliance frameworks, and the gaps that develop around them are often quiet ones. They do not show up in routine reviews. They surface when something goes wrong.
Two Conferences, One Conversation
OG Trust Services recently attended two conferences back to back, NTREA (the National Trust Real Estate Association) and FIRMA (the Fiduciary and Investment Risk Management Association). The conferences had different audiences and different areas of focus, but the overlap in what people were thinking about was notable.
At NTREA, trust real estate officers described a recurring situation: trust officers managing real estate decisions in their accounts without coordinating with the real estate department. Invoices paid without routing through an approval process. Vendors engaged without vetting. Decisions that created liability the institution was not aware of until after the fact.
At FIRMA, compliance officers were describing the same situation from a different vantage point: real estate assets being administered inconsistently, in ways that did not conform to the institution’s own policies because no centralized system existed to enforce consistency.
The observation that came up in both rooms was the same. The people with the clearest view of the exposure are often not the trust officers managing the day-to-day relationships. They are the real estate officers and compliance professionals watching from adjacent seats, close enough to see the gaps that relationships can obscure.
What This Looks Like in Practice
A trust holds a single-family residence. The beneficiary, an adult child with special needs, lives there. The bank serves as trustee. The trust officer is responsible for ensuring the property is properly maintained and that all obligations are met.
An invoice arrives from a lawn service. One hundred dollars. The trust officer pays it directly through the trust accounting system without routing it through the real estate department, a reasonable call in the moment.
The lawn service does not carry liability insurance. Two months later, a worker has an accident on the property and files a lawsuit against the trust and, by extension, the trustee.
A documented vendor approval process would have caught this. Insurance verification, documented authorization, and a workflow that routes the engagement through the appropriate review are standard practices in institutional real estate management. They require an agreed-upon process, a defined authority matrix, and a system that enforces the workflow consistently. Without that infrastructure, trust officers make individual judgment calls. Most of them are fine. Some are not, and in fiduciary management the consequences of the ones that are not can be significant.
The Authority Matrix
An authority matrix is a documented framework that specifies who can approve what, at what dollar threshold, and under what circumstances. It is the mechanism that keeps consequential decisions from resting with any single person without appropriate review.
Many trust departments managing real estate assets do not have a formal authority matrix for those assets. Without one, no software can enforce consistent approval workflows because there is no agreed-upon definition of what those workflows should be.
This is often where the conversation starts when a department first approaches us. They are looking for better tools. Before the tools can help, the institution needs to answer some foundational questions: what is the actual process, who has authority to approve what, and what requires involvement from the real estate or compliance department. Getting to those answers sometimes requires a multi-department conversation that has been deferred for a while.
The Value of Looking Clearly
There is a tendency in trust departments managing real estate to have a general sense that processes could be tighter without anyone moving to examine exactly how tight they are. Examining that question surfaces information that requires a response. That is uncomfortable, and the discomfort is understandable.
The more practical consideration is what the alternative looks like. A lapsed insurance policy on a beneficiary-occupied property. A missed property tax payment during a staff transition. A vendor engagement that was never documented. An OCC examiner asking to see the real estate administration process.
None of those outcomes is preferable to the work of getting the process right.
How OG Trust Services Approaches Real Estate Administration
We approach real estate administration the same way we work through oil and gas mineral management: starting with what an organization actually has, defining what the process should be, and then building the system to support it. VISION-ATLAS is the platform. The implementation services are the path to get there. The outcome is an institution that can account clearly and consistently for how it administers real estate assets on behalf of its clients.
That matters operationally. It also matters when a regulator or a beneficiary asks the question.
OG Trust Services provides VISION-ATLAS real estate asset management software and full implementation services for trust companies, family offices, and foundations. Contact us at info@ogtrustservices.com.
Walt Lotspeich, CMM, is President of OG Trust Services and a Certified Mineral Manager with more than two decades of experience in trust operations, wealth management, and financial technology. He helps trust companies, family offices, and foundations navigate the operational and compliance demands of managing mineral interests and real estate assets — and is a frequent speaker and podcast guest on mineral asset management, OCC Reg 9 compliance, and fiduciary technology.
View Walts’s full profile and credentials and LinkedIn Profile